Posts Tagged ‘Palestinians’

Israeli columnist: “Our leaders believe Arabs are fundamentally inferior.”

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Merav Michaeli tells it like it is:

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1157029.html

The president of Brazil, who visited Israel this week, defines himself as a negotiator and not as an ideologue. “I was born into the politics of dialogue, I became president of this country through dialogue and I have conducted my entire presidency by means of dialogue,” he told Haaretz. Speaking about the planned indirect talks with the Palestinians, he noted: “The importance of talks between third- and fourth-rank officials [does not hold] even 1 percent of the importance of tete-a-tete talks between leaders. Politics is mainly contact. People have to look at each other, sense each other. A leader has to look into the eyes of his interlocutor.”

President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has the support of 80 percent of the people in his country, which he has rehabilitated and improved amazingly during the seven years of his two terms in office. He apparently knows something about leadership.

Dialogue and negotiations are the opposite of war, victory and occupation, and looking into your partner’s eyes means openness, willingness and basic trust. Regrettably, no leader in Israel today possesses any of these. We have no leader who will look Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the eye and see there an equal partner, a desire for peace, sincerity or integrity.

The reason is a basic concept in psychology called “inner reality.” Anyone who has been in therapy knows how this works: With our human limitations, we have an inner picture of the world, the principles of which are determined very early in life, mainly by circumstances and the parents who raised us. Into these patterns, which are imprinted in us, we pour the element of reality. Prof. Dan Ariely, author of the book “Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions,” explains how the mind builds an expectation and then the expectation fulfills itself using our reality. That is, it’s not that we believe what we see, we simply always see what we have believed from the outset.

Our leaders, who have been “taking turns” with one another for more than 15 years now, have a picture of the world in which the Arabs are fundamentally inferior and want to throw us into the sea; we are in an existential danger and the whole world is against us. Each has his own reasons. Two of them have spent most of their adult lives living by the sword, one was an old-school, labor-movement, security-minded Zionist, and two are scions of very right-wing families. One of them also has a father who believes that the Holocaust has not ended.

Thus, no matter how deeply Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak, former prime minister Ehud Olmert, President Shimon Peres or former prime minister Ariel Sharon in his day look into the eyes of a Palestinian leader, all they see is a security threat, an existential threat and a loser.

It’s not by chance that they take turns. They belong to the same exclusive club: very privileged white males from well-connected families. The ideological differences among them are a question of nuance. Only two have been different: opposition leader Tzipi Livni, who comes from the same background but as a woman is already in a somewhat different position, and Labor MK Amir Peretz.

Peretz is their diametric opposite: a Mizrahi – someone with family origins in the Muslim countries. He grew up in a transit camp, has been a labor leader and someone who lives in a town in the outskirts of the country. When he was appointed defense minister, they chose not to remember that he had been seriously wounded as a munitions captain in the paratroopers. Instead, they preferred to jeer at him for that photo of him looking into binoculars with the lens caps on.

But it’s this picture, of a person for whom looking through binoculars is not taken for granted, that embodies a different option: a person who has not spent his life looking through crosshairs, who grew up among Arabs in Morocco and is not patronizing to them, who knows up close the position of impoverished inferiority.

It’s precisely a person like this looking into the eyes of a Palestinian leader who can find a true common language. But Peretz’s background also creates in the inner reality a glass ceiling that’s very hard to break from inside, and God is our witness that no one was glad to break it for him from the outside.

Bill a possible liability for Hill as she seeks Secy of State post?

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

 

People always wondered why Hillary Clinton would stay married to a man who was supposedly cheating on her every chance he got – even with ugly chicks and dumb chicks.  The usual reply is that it’s all about power.  Staying married to Bill means staying married to power, to money, to fame.  Hillary parlayed an otherwise mediocre legal career and undistinguished public life into a Senatorship from a state she’s not from, and has never lived in, and nearly into becoming President of these United States.

But now, reports Sharon Theimer of the Associated Press, Bill’s extensive foreign (double) dealings as ex-prez could nix her chances of being named Secratary of State by Our Great Leader (aka Barack Obama).

What gives?  For starters, Bill has hobnobbed with and taken cashola from many of the leaders Hillary has repeatedly blasted for being human rights violators.  For another, the UAE paid Bill as a consultant for how to deal with the Dubai Ports World mess in 2006 that Hillary helped create. 

(Remember how vociferous she was in destroying that deal?  She was the lead jingoistic cheerleader in the Senate’s deafening xenophobic cry to force Dubay and Dubya to cancel the deal.  And she sickeningly claimed that it had nothing to do with racism against Arabs – it was simply about preventing our [good, American, Christian!] ports from being controlled by foreigner, any foreigners.  Fortunately no one asked her why she was alright with Norway, the UK, and at least four other [good, white, Christian] nations controlling U.S. ports in cush arrangements similar to the one Dubai Ports World was seeking.)

The last paragraph of Ms. Theimer’s article, quoting Bill’s comments on the Palestinians from a March 2006 address to a London audience, is truly priceless.  In expressing the barest of sympathy for the Palis (whose nation he helped destroy), Bil created a scenario which, according to Ms. Theimer, would “make a White House press office rush for damage control.”

Yup, you say something like, “Palestinians are not pure evil,” and immediately the press and 400+ members of Congress are on you like bat dung.  (See Howard Dean in the 2004 primaries, and Hillary herself in 1998, to name but two of quadrillions of examples.)

The article in full is posted below, since I dread link rot.  The final paragraph on the Palis is priceless.

===START ARTICLE===
Husband’s foreign deals may pose issue for Clinton
by Sharon Theimer
Associated Press
11/15/08
 
WASHINGTON – Former President Bill Clinton’s globe-trotting business deals and fundraising for his foundation sometimes put his activities abroad at odds with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and could cause complications if President-elect Barack Obama picks her to be secretary of state.
 
During her own White House campaign, the New York senator criticized China for its crackdown on protesters in Tibet and urged President George W. Bush to skip the Olympics in Beijing. Her campaign was embarrassed by reports that her husband’s foundation had raised money from a Chinese Internet company that posted an online government “Most Wanted” notice seeking information on Tibetan human-rights activists that may have been involved in the demonstrations.
 
Hillary Clinton has campaigned as a champion of workers’ rights. This year, Brazilian labor inspectors found what they called “degrading” living conditions for sugar cane workers employed by an ethanol company in which Bill Clinton invested.
 
In the Senate, Clinton was an outspoken critic of a proposed deal under which a Dubai company planned to buy a British business that helped run six major U.S. ports. The company, DP World, privately sought Bill Clinton’s advice about how to respond to the controversy over the port plan, which later was abandoned.
 
Obama met with Hillary Clinton on Thursday at his headquarters in Chicago, and some Democrats were enthusiastic amid speculation the pair discussed the job of secretary of state. She declined Friday to say anything about the matter, and Obama is understood to be considering other candidates as his top diplomat, including Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., Democratic Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico and retiring Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb.
Bill Clinton’s fundraising for his presidential library and charitable activities also could pose additional headaches for his wife if he selects her for the job.
 
Since leaving the White House in early 2001, Bill Clinton has raised at least $353 million for the William J. Clinton Foundation, which finances his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., as well as his global anti-AIDS initiative and other charitable efforts.
 
The former president has raised money overseas beyond the Chinese Internet company’s contributions: from the Saudi royal family, the king of Morocco, a foundation linked to the United Arab Emirates and the governments of Kuwait and Qatar, The New York Times reported last year.
 
His foundation reaped millions of dollars from Canadian mining tycoon Frank Giustra, and Clinton accompanied Giustra on a 2005 trip to Kazakhstan, whose human-rights record Hillary Clinton had criticized, the newspaper reported. The pair met with Kazakhstan’s president, and within days Giustra’s company landed preliminary agreements giving it rights to buy into uranium projects controlled by a Kazakhstan state-owned enterprise. Clinton said he had nothing to do with the deal.
 
Louis Freeh, the FBI director under the former president, said Clinton sought a library donation from Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah during a discussion of the investigation into the deadly 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers U.S. military dormitory in Saudi Arabia.
Freeh wrote in his book “My FBI” that the FBI was trying to get Abdullah to let the FBI question suspects the Saudi kingdom had in custody and that Clinton failed to pressure Abdullah.
 
Clinton denied Freeh’s account, and has said his business dealings and foundation fundraising pose no political conflicts for his wife. The former president has so far refused to identify donors to his foundation.
 
Matt McKenna, a spokesman for the former president, declined to comment on any potential difficulties that Clinton’s activities could pose for his wife should she become secretary of state or whether the former president would alter any of his fundraising or other activities to avoid potential conflicts.
 
The Clintons have taken in more than $100 million since leaving the White House, thanks in large part to six-figure speaking fees charged by the former president and to his book royalties and partnership with Yucaipa Global Opportunities Fund, a Los Angeles-based investment firm founded by a longtime Clinton fundraiser.
 
Bill Clinton has cultivated the image of a senior statesman since leaving the White House and often makes speeches abroad. That role could be diminished if his wife were representing the Obama administration on international issues.
 
In a 6,400-word speech in London in March 2006, the former president laid out his views on a variety of world issues, including the Middle East peace process. Buried in the lengthy address were a few lines that could make a White House press office rush for damage control.
 
“The Palestinians are younger and poorer today than they were when we started the peace process in 1993,” he said. “And I have never met a single poor Palestinian anywhere in the world except in the Palestinian territories. Every single Palestinian I know in America is a millionaire or a college professor, and I say that with deep respect, but when there is a conflict, when there is an absence of security, there is always an absence of opportunity.”
===END ARTICLE===